Yes, I've used Samplitude in the past and have never experienced what you've described.Samplitude has come a long way: With roots deep in the 90s, the DAW seemed to lose ground to competitors for a while, before catching back up with the releases of Samplitude Pro X3 and X4 in 20, respectively.
the most recent "Express FX" native plug-ins sound great, especially "eFX Reverb" which sounds phenomenal, just gorgeous.Either you're doing it wrong, missing something, or it's an overlooked "bug" in the code. the most recent "Express FX" native plug-ins sound great, especially "eFX Reverb" which sounds phenomenal, just gorgeous. It's less tidy digitally speaking, but sonically it's very pleasing and musical. Since Samplitude is not open-source and since I'm not a programmer, my best guess is that there is an element of randomness built into the DSP. Instead of silence, you'll hear heavy reverb, the swirl of any flange/chorus used in original mix, occasional transient artifacts from dynamic processing, etc. If the two files are identical they should null. Invert the phase on one of the two tracks, then play. Now load Mix_A and Mix_B in a DAW in their own separate tracks. You should now have two identical WAV files, since it's the same unaltered mix. Next, bounce it down again to a separate stereo file (Mix_B), without making any alterations or changes to the settings. For example, open up any completed polished mix, then bounce it down to a stereo file (Mix_A.wav). In Samplitude, a lot of the effects - such as reverb, modulation (phase, flange.), but also compression - behave like analogue gear. But what about the sound quality, compared to other DAWs? I'm a longtime user of Samplitude, so I can sing its praises, especially the Object Editor, which I could not live without.
0 kommentar(er)
